Rural settlements – Answer to David Kenyons email re Church Farm

As defined in the South Somerset Local Plan, South Somerset is the largest district in the county covering an area of 958 square kilometres (370 square miles); and has the largest population in the county at approximately 167,861 (2018). South Somerset is largely rural with the population distributed across many towns, villages and hamlets, resulting in a population density of 1.7 people per hectare, less than half the national average.

However, over 40% of the district’s population live in settlements of fewer than 2,500 residents and the district is made up of a mixture of sparsely inhabited rural areas, a network of villages and a number of market towns of varying size and influence. 

The smallest places in South Somerset, the Rural Settlements, vary widely in function and size, but generally are places that provide limited local services. These settlements often have a strong sense of community.

Policy SS 2 defines a Rural settlement as having two or more of the following facilities:

∙ local convenience shop;

 âˆ™ post office; 

∙ pub;

 âˆ™ children’s play area/sports pitch;

 âˆ™ village hall/community centre;

 âˆ™ health centre;

 âˆ™ faith facility; and 

∙ primary school.

The settlements of Bayford, Stoke Trister and Cucklington fall into this category by virtue of having Village Halls, Church and Pub.

However, the application is for one house, not a development in the sense of development as seen in nearby Market Town of Wincanton. This application, if granted would enhance the true rural community and their sustainability.

A precedent has already been set in Stoke Trister by approving 2 houses so far on nearby farmland Church Farm reference 19/00258/OUT. The proposal states “Outline application (including access) with all other matters reserved for the redevelopment of Church Farm buildings and bungalow and erection of 2 dwellings” which was approved in November 2019 by the same case officer, and that was yourself Mr Kenyon. There was also approval for Planning Application No: 18/01991/FUL – Land at Sycamore Farm, Stoke Trister, Wincanton. BA9 9PE you were also the case officer for this application. 

We recall both of these applications were opposed by majority of neighbours, refused before and eventually granted. We do not recall being asked to clarify if SS2 applied then and therefore why are you asking for clarification of whether these settlements are classed as SS2 by the Parish Council. This approval in the wording of the Church Farm application has the potential to open up farmland for further development of many houses whereas the application 20/00638/FUL, is only asking for one house for private residence for the applicants. What is the relevance here?  

Riding Gate House Riding Gate Wincanton

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Minutes of a Site Planning Meeting of 

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council Held electronically.

Present: All Councillors 

1. Apologies – None

2. Declarations of Interest – None

3. Planning 

Planning Application No: 20/02418/FUL

Location: Riding Gate House, Riding Gate, Wincanton.

Proposal: Conversion of existing outbuilding to provide ancillary accommodation.

Decision;

No objections.

……………………………………………….                            ……………………….

Chairman         Date

Land adjacent to Orchard Farm, Leigh Common, Wincanton.

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Minutes of an Electronically controlled Planning Meeting of

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council 

Present:  All Councillors

1. Apologies – None

2. Declarations of Interest – None

3. Planning 

Planning Application No:  20/01511/FUL

Land adjacent to Orchard Farm, Leigh Common, Wincanton.

Decision:

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council have no objections to the attached application provided it is done completely in line with the plan produced.

………………………………………………………………………………………..

Chairman Date

Windmill Hill, Bayford, Wincanton

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Minutes of an electronically controlled Planning Meeting of

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council 

Present:  All Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Councillors

1. Apologies – None

2. Declarations of Interest – None

3. Planning 

Planning Application No:   20/00359/OUT

Location:  Land to the East of Penn View, Bayford Hill, Wincanton

Proposal:  Outline application with all matters reserved for residential development of up to 100 dwellings with associated access, internal roads and footpaths, car parking, public open space, landscaping, drainage and other associated works and infrastructure.

Decision:

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council have held an electronic planning meeting due to the emergency situation in the country and unanimously recommend refusal of this planning application on the grounds of:

  • We recommended refusal on the previous applications for the same site (please see our comments in 2017). Whilst there are a smaller number of houses the area for development remains unchanged. 
  • This application does not conform to the STWB Parish Plan of 2014. Whilst the development may be in Wincanton territory, the impact will be greatly felt in Bayford. 
  • Wincanton housing needs have already been met and set to double with planning applications already agreed. Bayford has no requirement for more houses. The infrastructure to accommodate an increase in this number of houses does not exist in Bayford or Wincanton.
  • There is insufficient employment, primary school places to accommodate this level of increase in population.
  • The development site is Grade 2 and Grade 3a agricultural land and once built on, this land will be lost forever to agriculture. Brown field sites should be used before quality agricultural land is built on. According to the NPPF, policies should be in place to safeguard the long-term potential of the best and most versatile agricultural land, which is defined as Grade 1, 2, and 3a.
  • The geology of the site, if developed and built on could cause flooding to both Bayford and Wincanton.
  • There is no Transport infrastructure to support this development with only 2 buses running per week through Bayford. Given the location and lack of realistic travel modes, future residents of the site are likely to be unduly dependent on private cars for access to employment, shopping, medical and social needs. This will add to the carbon footprint and very damaging environmentally.  Therefore, the Transport Assessment in the application is incorrect.
  • The access to the site is dangerous as it is a very busy road, with private vehicles, farm vehicles and lorries using it constantly. There has already been numerous accidents and one fatality on this road,
  • This development if allowed to go ahead, will destroy the Natural ‘green boundary’ between Bayford and Wincanton.
  • CPRE Somerset suggests that the ‘considerable harm’ identified by the Inspector to ‘the character and appearance of the area’ still remains due to the location of the development in the indicative plan. Therefore they recommend refusal of the application as it would contradict the Local Plan Policy SD1. 

…………………………………………………… ………………………

Chairman               Date

Mr&Mrs Garrett

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Minutes of an electronically controlled Planning Meeting of

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Present:  All Stoke Trister wth Bayford Parish Councillors

1. Apologies – None

2. Declarations of Interest – Cllr Garrett

3. Planning 

Planning Application No:  20/00638/FUL

Mr & Mrs Garrett

Highcroft

Stoke Trister.

Erection of a dwelling (resubmission)

Decision:

Due to Government Guidelines on Social Distancing we were unable to conduct a site meeting. Therefore the meeting was conducted online.

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council have no objections and are unanimously in support of this application.

……………………………………………….. ……………………….

Chairman Date

Hopkins Estates, Devenish Lane

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Minutes of a Site Planning Meeting of 

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council Held electronically.

Present: All Councillors 

1. Apologies – None

2. Declarations of Interest – None

3. Planning 

Planning Application No:  20/03028/S73A

Location: Land OS 3969 Part Devenish Lane, Bayford, Wincanton.

Proposal: S73A application to vary condition 2 (approved plans) of planning approval 18/03272/FUL to allow a minor re-arrangement of the layout including plot orientation and the garage to plot 3.

Decision:

No comment

………………………………..                          ………………………..

Chairman     Date

Jemima Green, Stoke Trister

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Minutes of an electronically controlled planning meeting

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council 

Present:  ALL STOKE TRISTER COUNCILLORS

1. Apologies – NONE

2. Declarations of Interest – NONE

3. Planning 

Planning Application No:  20/00352/S73

Miss Jemima Green

Mitchells Farm, Stoke Trister Road, Stoke Trister, Wincanton.

Section 73 application to very condition 2 (approved plans) of permission 19/02787/FUL to allow relocation of horse walker.

Decision:

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council voted unanimously in favour of the above application.

………………………………………………………. ……………………………

Chairman Date

Letter to Mr Cummins, Unicorn Inn, Bayford

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council_________________                                           

Clerk to the Council

Mrs P Gillman

Horseshoes

Tuckers Lane

Ansford

Castle Cary

BA7 7LH

01963 359598

stoketristerpc@gmail.com

13 March 2020

Mr R Cummins

The Unicorn Inn

Bayford

Wincanton

BA9 9NL

Dear Mr Cummins

Following our Planning Meeting of 6 March 2020 when the Chairman stated that many residents had requested that the Unicorn Inn be placed on the Assets of the Community Value Register, this was reiterated by many residents once again at our Parish Council Meeting of 12 March 2020.

Therefore, we are placing the Unicorn Inn on the Assets of the Community Value Register with immediate effect.

Yours sincerely

Patricia Gillman

Clerk to Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Mr Stocks, Cyhnthia Paddocks, Pen Selwood. BA99 8LD

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Minutes of a Site Planning Meeting of 

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council held on 10 January 2020 at 10.00 am

CONSULTATION

Present:  Cllrs: N Linsley (Chairman) M Grant (Vice Chairman) J Macfarlane and J Garrett. D/Cllr Robin Bastable.

Public: Andrew Jenkins – (Vice Chairman) Pen Selwood Parish Council. Mr Paul Shiner.

1. Apologies – Cllrs: J McKenna, R Webb-Bowen and M Summerfield. 

2. Declarations of Interest – None

3. Planning 

Planning Application No:   19/03362/COL

Location:  Cynthia Paddocks, Leigh Common, Pen Selwood. BA9 8LD

Proposal:  Application for a Certificate of Lawfulness for the existing use of a dwelling.

Decision:

The owner of Cynthia Paddocks Mr Stocks refused extremely assertively several times to allow Councillors entry to the building site so that they could view the property.  Eventually after much discussion the Councillors were allowed to step just inside the gate which was approximately 75 – 100 mtrs from the actual property. Still very little could be seen of the building as there were large vehicles obstructing any view.

Mr Stocks purchased the land with a stable in 2007 and continued to live in it. Over a period of time he has continued to increase the size of the stable for further living accommodation. No change of use has ever been applied for and no Council Tax has ever been paid on the building that he has continued to live in.

Councillors couldn’t make any observations on the matter because the owner couldn’t provide any hard evidence of what he was telling us. 

Further discussion with the Planning Officer was absolutely necessary on this occasion.

…………………………………………………………. ……………………….

Chairman Date

Simon Minney Riding Gate House, Riding Gate.

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council

Minutes of a Site Planning Meeting of 

Stoke Trister with Bayford Parish Council held on Friday 11 October 2019 at10.20 am

Present:  Cllrs: N Linsley (Chairman) J Macfarlane and M Summerfield.

1. Apologies – Cllrs: M Grant, J McKenna, R Webb-Bowen and J Garrett

2. Declarations of Interest – None

3. Planning 

Planning Application No: 19/02369/FUL

Applicant: Mr Simon Minney

Location:  Riding Gate House, Riding Gate, Wincanton. BA9 8NQ

Proposal:  Conversion of an existing outbuilding to an annex/holiday let.

Decision:

  1. On principle restoring this building there are no objections. It is a positive approach to restore and old building.
  2. One comment we wish to make is that the existing pantiles be used rather than the tiles on the application. This would maintain the character of an old building.
  3. When we reviewed the planning Application No: 19/00448/HOU we requested that the mobile home should be removed.
  4. We note that that there is now a substantial wood cladded building in place now. Has planning permission been granted for this? 
  5. Will this also be used for a holiday let?
  6. Will planning permission be required for change of use for both of these buildings for holiday lets?

………………………………………………. …………………………….

Chairman Date

1 2 3 4 5 6 … 8